Skip to main content

Table 3 Pair-wise cortical thickness comparisons by diagnostic group

From: Regional cortical thinning in young adults with schizophrenia but not psychotic or non-psychotic bipolar I disorder

 

ROI

CON vs. SCZ

CON vs. PBD

CON vs. NPBD

SCZ vs. PBD

SCZ vs. NPBD

Frontal

2. Superior fontal

   

PBD > SCZ

p = 0.001

NPBD > SCZ

p = 0.004

4. Caud. Mid. frontal

   

PBD > SCZ

p = 0.033

 

8. Precentral

   

PBD > SCZ

p = 0.003

 

9. Paracentral

CON > SCZ

p = 0.004

  

PBD > SCZ

p < 0.001

NPBD > SCZ

p = 0.004

Parietal

13. Inferior parietal

CON > SCZ

p = 0.033

  

PBD > SCZ

p = 0.035

NPBD > SCZ

p = 0.003

14. Supramarginal

CON > SCZ

p = 0.015

  

PBD > SCZ

p = 0.009

 

Temporal

17. Temporal pole

     

18. Sup. temporal

     

19. Mid. temporal

CON > SCZ

p = 0.027

   

NPBD > SCZ

p = 0.032

22. Fusiform

CON > SCZ

p = 0.032

  

PBD > SCZ

p = 0.004

NPBD > SCZ

p < 0.001

24. Parahippocampal

    

NPBD > SCZ

p = 0.042

25. Entorhinal

     

Cingulate

31. Caud. Ant. cingulate

SCZ > CON

p = 0.028

PBD > CON

p = 0.005

NPBD > CON

p < 0.001

  

32. Post. cingulate

  

NPBD > CON

p < 0.001

 

NPBD > SCZ

p < 0.001

Insula

34. Insula

    

NPBD > SCZ

p = 0.016

  1. Values shown reflect p values Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons for five comparisons within each region. Italicized values indicate regions that are smaller in control participants
  2. Blank cells indicate a p value greater than 0.05 after correcting for multiple comparisons. No differences in PBD and NPBD groups was observed
  3. ROI region of interest, CON control, SCZ schizophrenia, PBD psychotic bipolar disorder, NPBD non-psychotic bipolar disorder, Ant. anterior, Sup. superior, Post. posterior, Caud. caudal, Mid. middle