Table 3 Mean working memory (WM) capacity as estimated using Pashler’s K (SD)
From: Transdiagnostic comparison of visual working memory capacity in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia
| WM Capacity mean (SD) |
Group comparisons Effect size (p-value) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HC | PBD | BP-I | BP-II | BP HPS + | BP HPS- | PSZ | SZ | SZAFF | ||
| HC |
3.39 (0.61) | – | 0.202 (0.020)* |
0.167 (0.082) | 0.214 (0.038)* | 0.216 (0.029)* |
0.156 (0.120) | 0.370 (< 0.001)* | 0.340 (< 0.001)* | 0.347 (< 0.001)* |
| PBD |
3.15 (0.75) | 0.202 (0.020)* | – | – | – | – | – | 0.201 (0.024)* | – | – |
| BP-I |
3.22 (0.62) |
0.167 (0.082) | – | – |
0.104 (0.414) | – | – | – |
0.211 (0.061) | 0.290 (0.025)* |
| BP-II |
3.03 (0.92) | 0.214 (0.038)* | – |
0.104 (0.414) | – | – | – | – |
0.105 (0.395) |
0.180 (0.217) |
| BP HPS + |
3.19 (0.56) | 0.216 (0.029)* | – | – | – | – |
0.038 (0.767) | – |
0.169 (0.148) |
0.262 (0.052) |
| BP HPS- |
3.10 (0.92) |
0.156 (0.120) | – | – | – |
0.038 (0.767) | – |
0.171 (0.150) |
0.233 (0.090) | |
| PSZ |
2.90 (0.77) | 0.370 (< 0.001)* | 0.201 (0.024)* | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| SZ |
2.89 (0.81) | 0.340 (< 0.001)* | – |
0.211 (0.061) |
0.105 (0.395) |
0.169 (0.148) |
0.171 (0.150) | – | – |
-0.047 (0.705) |
| SZAFF |
2.90 (0.70) | 0.347 (< 0.001)* | – | 0.290 (0.025)* |
0.180 (0.217) |
0.262 (0.052) |
0.233 (0.090) | – |
-0.047 (0.705) | – |