Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: Lithium use in childhood and adolescence, peripartum, and old age: an umbrella review

Study

Number of primary studies

Design of primary studies

Number of individuals treated with Li+

Patients’ description

Specifically focused on lithium

Specific outcomes on Li+

Meta-analytic findings on Li+ a

Findings on efficacy

Findings on safety

Conclusions

Liu et al. 2011

7

Open label, double-blind studies

151

Children (< 18 years) with BD

No

Efficacy of Li+ for paediatric BD

No

Open-label: response rates: 23%-55%; Double-blind: 1/3 found Li+ to induce long-term stabilisation

Limited data available

Amerio et al. 2018

30

RCTs, observational studies

1320

Children and adolescents (< 18 years) with BD treated with Li+ monotherapy or combined with other drugs

Yes

Safety and efficacy of Li+ for paediatric BD

No

Li+ monotherapy: efficacy for acute mania in up to 50% of patients; some evidence of long-term maintenance efficacy Combination therapy: some evidence for Li+  + APs and Li+  + DVP

Li+ generally safe in the short term. Most common AEs: gastrointestinal, polyuria or headache

Li+ reasonably safe and effective in children and adolescents with BD in the short-term

Duffy et al. 2018

4

RCTs

176

Children and adolescents (< 18 years) with BD experiencing a manic or mixed episode

Yes

Efficacy and tolerability of Li+ for paediatric mania

Yes

Li+  > plc and comparable to DVP, but < Risp for treating manic/mixed episodes and comorbid ADHD

Li+ not associated with serious AEs, and generally well tolerated with common AEs similar to those reported in adults

Limited data to suggest that Li+ is effective and tolerable for some forms of paediatric mania

Pisano et al. 2019

19

Open label, RCTs

871

Children and adolescents with BD and MDD

Yes

Efficacy and safety of Li+ for paediatric BD and MDD

No

Li + effective for manic symptoms, both in the acute phase and as maintenance strategy. Efficacy on depressive symptoms less clear

Generally, Li + resulted relatively safe

Li + is effective and well-tolerated in paediatric BD. Further evidences are needed for other clinical indications

Yee et al. 2019

5

RCTs, open-label

143

Youths (< 18 years) with BD treated for at least 6 months

No

Efficacy and safety of Li+ for the maintenance of juvenile BD lasting ≥ 24 weeks

Yes

Clinical response rate: 51.1% [CI = 0 to 164]

Mean AE risk: 23.9% [CI = 18.1 to 29.7]

Li+ may reduce long-term morbidity in juvenile BD. Limited data

Peripartum and lactation

Doucet et al. 2011

10

Open, retrospective, prospective, studies, case reports

73

Women with PP mood episodes with psychotic features exposed to Li+

No

Effectiveness of Li+ for the prevention or treatment of PP psychosis

No

5 studies supported the prophylactic effect of Li+, 3 studies supported the use of lithium in treating PP

Preliminary evidence suggests Li+ to be effective for PP psychosis prevention and treatment

Galbally et al. 2010

12

Case–control, prospective studies, case series

773

Women exposed to Li+ during pregnancy

No

Pregnancy AEs and child developmental outcomes (safety)

No

Ebstein’s anomaly, prematurity and ↑ birth weight reported. Negative results in cohort-controlled studies

Limited data available

Uguz et al. 2016

5

Case series, case reports

26

Women with BD treated with Li+ during lactation

No

Infant AEs (safety)

No

Few clinically significant AEs reported

The incidence of AEs in infants exposed to Li+ is very low

Pacchiarotti et al. 2016

6

Case series, case reports

35

Women with BD treated with Li+ during lactation

No

Infant AEs (safety)

No

No clinically significant AEs reported

Available data supports the use of Li+ as during breastfeeding

Haskey et al. 2017

2

Retrospective cohort studies

18

Women exposed to Li+ during pregnancy

No

Child developmental outcomes (safety)

No

No AEs on cognitive development

Data on Li+ exposure are reassuring but are both limited and low quality

Poels et al. 2018

9

Cohort studies, case reports

107

Women exposed to Li+ during pregnancy

Yes

Neurodevelopmental consequences for the child (safety)

No

Clinical cohort studies: Li+ associated with normal development. Case reports: Most (4/5) reported at least one AE

Interpretation is difficult due to study heterogeneity

Imaz et al. 2019

13

Case reports, case series

39

Women treated with Li+ during lactation

Yes

AEs or developmental outcomes in infants (safety)

No

80% of breasted infants showed no AE 20.% showed at least one AE

Heterogeneity and low-moderate quality of studies

Newmark et al. 2019

12

Case reports

37

Women treated with Li+ during lactation

Yes

Infant AEs (safety)

No

AEs were reported in 9.4% of breastfed infants

Limited data

Fornaro et al. 2020

29, 13 for meta-analysis

Case–control, cohort, and interventional

2,622

Women with BD treated with Li+ during pregnancy and the PP compared to unexposed control subjects (both women in the general population and patients with affective disorders not exposed to Li+)

Yes

Relapse prevention (efficacy); risk of any malformation (safety)

Yes

Li+  > no Li+ in relapse prevention (OR = 0.16, 95%CI = 0.03–0.89)

Li+ associated with ↑ risk of any congenital anomaly (OR = 1.81, 95%CI = 1.35 to 2.4); cardiac anomalies (OR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.16 to 2.96); spontaneous abortion (OR = 3.77, 95% CI = 1.15 to 12.39). Compared only with unexposed mood disorder patients, significant results only for spontaneous abortion and cardiac anomalies (in 1st trimester). No association with preterm birth and low birth weight

Li+ exposure-associated risk at any time during pregnancy is low; ↑ risk for 1st-trimester or higher-dosage exposure

Uguz 2020

9

Any design, including case reports and case series

142

Women with BD exposed to Li+ during pregnancy and the PP

No

Relapse prevention (efficacy)

No

BD recurrence rates:

Pregnancy: 22.7%

PP: 20.3%

Li+ effective in preventing new mood episodes in BD during the perinatal period

Advanced age

Ross 2008

3

Prospective, RCTs

38 using Li+ followed by discontinuation

Patients > 65 years with MDD treated with Li+ augmentation to AD, followed by Li+ discontinuation

Yes

Relapse prevention (efficacy)

No

Recurrence rates after discontinuation: 50% relapse over 6 months follow-up

Risk of relapse in elderly patients whose Li+ augmentation treatment for MDD is discontinued. Limited data

Cooper et al. 2011

5

Open-label, RCTs

64

Patients > 55 years with treatment resistant MDD treated with Li+ augmentation

No

Response to treatment (efficacy)

Yes

The overall response rate for Li+ augmentation was 42% (95% CI = 21–65)

Replicated evidence for Li+ augmentation as effective in treatment resistant MDD

Rej et al. 2012

10

RCTs, case–control studies, retrospective, cross-sectional, descriptive

835

Patients > 65 years using Li+

Yes

Renal AEs (safety)

No

ARF incidence: 1.5% per person-year, CRF prevalence: 1.2% to 34%; The prevalence of NDI:1.8% to 85%

No evidence to suggest that Li+ should be avoided in elderly patients

De Fazio et (2017)

15

Retrospective, prospective, RCTs

701

Patients > 50 years with BD

Yes

Efficacy and safety of Li+ in the treatment and prevention of the mania

No

In the 2 RCTs: Li+  > plc and ≥ other mood stabilizers; Recent retrospective/ prospective studies: average 72% positive response to Li+

Less AEs at lower doses

Evidence suggests that Li+ is effective and well tolerated; limited evidence

Sun et al. 2018

37

Case reports

38

Patients > 65 years using Li+ with BD or MDD

Yes

Li+ toxicity in elderly (safety)

No

Most common AEs: neurotoxicity, renal and cardiovascular toxicity. Precipitating factors: polypharmacy, comorbidity, high Li+ concentration

Lower doses of Li+ should be used in the elderly

  1. aMeta-analytic data were considered only if separately reporting results on lithium
  2. increase(d), > superior, < inferior, ≥ superior or comparable, about, AD antidepressants, ADHD Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, AE(s) adverse event(s), AP(s) antipsychotic(s), ARF acute renal failure, BD Bipolar Disorder, CRF Chronic renal failure, DVP sodium divalproex, CI confidence interval, Li+ lithium, MDD major depressive disorder, NDI nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, OR odds ratio, plc placebo, PP postpartum, RCT randomised-control trial, Risp Risperidone, SMD standardised mean difference