Skip to main content

Table 6 Continuous Performance Test: effect sizes

From: Impulsivity: present during euthymia in bipolar disorder? - a systematic review

Study

BD group

Control group

Effect size

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Ancin et al. (2010)

N = 141

N = 101

 

  False alarm rate, block 3

10.6 (12.3)

8.6 (11.6)

0.167

  Response criterion, block 3

0.65 (0.72)

0.53 (0.87)

0.15

Brooks et al. (2010)

N = 16

N = 11

 

  Commission errors

15.5 (7.9)

10.5 (5.5)

0.68

Fleck et al. (2005)

N = 23

N = 28

 

  Response criterion

0.49 (0.22)

0.52 (0.20)

-0.14

Iosifescu et al. (2009)

N = 20

N = 10

 

  Commission errors

12.41 (4.82)

7.50 (4.93)

1.01

Kolur et al. (2006)

N = 30

N = 30

 

  Commission error

21.40 (29.91)

12.73 (7.15)

0.47

Malloy-Diniz et al. (2011)

N = 95

N = 94

 

  Commission errors

16.17 (8.76)

10.26 (7.2)

0.74

Martino et al. (2008)

N = 20

N = 20

 

  False alarm rate

6.7 (6.1)

4.0 (3.4)

0.57

Strakowski et al. (2010)

N = 31

N = 35

 

  Response criterion

0.69 (0.28)

0.67 (0.30)

0.07

Swann et al. (2003)

N = 25

N = 35

 

  DMT commission errors

21.1 (18.8)

17.9 (15.5)

0.19

Swann et al. (2004)

N = 37

N = 16

 

  DMT commission errors

13.6 (9.0)

18.4 (15.6)

-0.44

Thompson et al. (2009)

N = 63

N = 63

 

  Commission errors

2.61 (3.10)

1.73 (2.23)

0.33