Skip to main content
International Journal of Bipolar Disorders
Download PDF
Download ePub

Stigma in people living with bipolar disorder and their families: a systematic review

International Journal of Bipolar Disorders volume 11, Article number: 9 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Stigma affects different life aspects in people living with bipolar disorder and their families. This study aimed to examining the experience of stigma and evaluating predictors, consequences and strategies to combat stigma in people with bipolar disorder and their families.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) in 2022. We extensively reviewed six online databases (PubMed, Scopus, Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science and Google Scholar). Articles published in the English language about stigma in people living with bipolar disorders and their families were included.

Results

A total of 42,763 articles were retrieved, of which 40 articles from 14 countries were included in this study (n = 7417 participants). Of the 40 articles, 29 adopted quantitative methods (72.5%), two used mixed-methods (5%), eight used qualitative (20%) methods, and one was a case series (2.5%). The results of the studies were categorized into four themes: 1. Stigma experienced by people living with bipolar disorders and their families, 2. Predictors of stigma in people living with bipolar disorders and their families, 3. Consequences of stigma in people living with bipolar disorders and their families, 4. Effective interventions and strategies to reduce stigma in people living with bipolar disorders and their families.

Conclusion

The results of this study might be useful to design psychiatric cognitive interventions to reduce stigma in people living with bipolar disorders and their families and designing community-based interventions to normalize bipolar disorder at the community level.

Background

Psychiatric disorders are one of the five leading causes of disability. Bipolar disorder is one of the most persistent, important, and severe psychiatric disorders. Approximately 1% of the population suffers from bipolar disorders and is equally common in both genders (Angst 2013; Jolfaei et al. 2019; Mohammadi et al. 2019). Bipolar disorder is described in the DSM-5 as a group of brain disorders that cause extreme fluctuation in mood, energy, and function, ranging from depressive to schizophrenia. People with bipolar disorder experience periods of excitement, overactivity, delirium, and euphoria (known as mania), and other periods of feeling sadness and hopelessness (known as depression) (Kaltenboeck et al. 2016; Khaleghi et al. 2018).

People with bipolar disorder have been neglected in the society. Several factors contribute to poor support for people with bipolar disorders, including costly care in medical centers, poor cooperation between supportive organizations and insurance companies, and de-institutionalization movement policies. As a result, most families are responsible for caring for people with bipolar disorders (BİLİR, 2018; Ghai et al. 2013). The experience of caring for such people can be different from other mental illnesses. The reason for this difference goes back to the nature of the disease, which has a periodic state and has an oscillating nature (Bruni et al. 2018). Stigma is one of the most common and challenging social issues that affect people living with bipolar disorder (Grover et al. 2019; Sharma et al., 2017).

Stigma can be considered a combination of three problems: lack of knowledge (ignorance and misinformation), negative attitudes (prejudice), and rejection or avoidance behaviors (discrimination) (Goffman 2003; Henderson et al. 2013). The history of stigma and rejection from society backs to ancient times (Gur et al. 2012). The presence of stigma is the most serious concern for patients; because they must cope with the disease and symptoms and adapt to negative attitudes and society labeling (Knight et al. 2006; Sibitz et al. 2011; Wong et al. 2009). Stigma impairs people’s quality of life and leads to their isolation and rejection of interpersonal relationships. The rejection from society and low self-esteem, following the fear of rejection, weakens living conditions, reduces income, and causes unemployment for people with bipolar disorders (Connell et al. 2014; Latifian et al. 2022a, b, c).

Stigma is also common among families of people living with bipolar disorder. The parents of such patients, reprimanding by ordinary and professional people, look for the causes of the disease and experience issues such as guilt attribution and social exclusion due to having a family member with such disorder (Koschorke et al. 2014; Latifian et al. 2022a, b, c; McCann et al. 2011). Family stigma contributes to decreased self-esteem, sleep disorders, decreased psychological well-being, and reduced quality of life (Wong et al. 2009). Another consequence of stigma is the inability of families to seek treatment. About 50–60% of people living with neurological disorders refuse treatment or care due to fear of stigma for themselves and their family members (Park & Park 2014). In the study by Ando et al., one of the reasons for the delay in counseling was concerned about people’s thoughts (Ando et al. 2013). In addition, stigma increases the risk of suicide in people living with bipolar disorders and their families and is cited as one of its causes (Aggarwal et al. 2014).

Although stigma is a global phenomenon, the experience of dealing with it and the discrimination varies across countries and even cities. In general, the reaction of people in the community to patients with psychiatric disorders can vary depending on the severity of illness, culture, and changes over time (Keshavarz et al. 2018; Shamsaiee et al., 2013).

The increasing experience of stigma in people living with bipolar disorders and their families, as well as the significant role of psychological and social interventions in reducing the stigma of this disease, make it more necessary to pay attention to the various dimensions of this phenomenon (Latifian et al. 2022a, b, c). So far, a number of review articles have been done in the field of stigma in bipolar disorder. For example, in the study by Perich et al., stigma in bipolar disorder is compared with schizophrenia, personality disorders and anxiety disorders. Also, general stigma has been compared with greater functional impairment and lower levels of functional impairment (Perich et al. 2022). In the study by Pal et al., only the researches that have been conducted in India in a quantitative and qualitative manner have been examined (Pal et al. 2021). Ellison et al. also conducted a review study. This review aimed to identify publications which investigated public attitudes and/or beliefs about bipolar disorder or explored internalised stigma in bipolar disorder between 1992 and 2012 (Ellison et al. 2013). In 2013, a review article was prepared by Hawke et al. The purpose of this article was to identify guidelines and specialized interventions for the development of stigma reduction initiatives in bipolar patients by April 2012 (Hawke et al. 2013).

Review of studies showed that each of the studies conducted in this field investigated one of the dimensions of stigma in one of the two groups of people living with bipolar disorders and their families. Even in some cases, differences and disagreements were seen in the results of these studies. Information on the different dimensions of stigma and blame and analyzing the similarities and differences of the results of previous studies in both groups, with a comprehensive review of this issue, can lead to a better and more comprehensive understanding of this issue. However, there are no systematic reviews addressing these issues. Therefore, the present study aimed at examining the experience of stigma and evaluating the predictors, consequences, and strategies to combat stigma in people living with bipolar disorder and their families by December 2022.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review to analyze research findings on stigma in people living with bipolar disorders and their families. This study was performed according to the directions denoted by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) in 2022.

Search strategy

This study included all articles published in English from the earliest indexed articles to December 2022, including descriptive, survey, correlation, case report, cohort, experimental, quasi-experimental, qualitative, and mixed-method studies on stigma in people living with bipolar disorders and their families. For this purpose, the keywords of "bipolar disorder"[Title/Abstract] OR "manic"[Title/Abstract] OR "depression"[Title/Abstract] AND "stigma"[Title/Abstract] OR "self-stigma"[Title/Abstract] OR "public stigma"[Title/Abstract] OR "internalized stigma"[Title/Abstract] OR "mental illness stigma"[Title/Abstract] OR "stigmatization"[Title/Abstract] AND "Family" [Title/Abstract] OR "caregiver"[Title/Abstract] were searched in the "PubMed", "Scopus", "Medline", "EMBASE", "Web of Science" and "Google Scholar" databases.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria were: articles published in English and presence of stigma in people living with bipolar disorder or their families. Exclusion criteria comprised the unavailability of full text, being a review study, and the lack of a clear explanation of research methods. Considering the statistical population of the research, the data obtained from the studies were categorized in terms of the subject, methodology, and validity and then analyzed. Before conducting the literature review, a form was prepared according to study goals and presented to the research team for data extraction after teaching them how to complete it.

Quality assessment of screened studies

Three researchers independently performed a literature search in different databases, initial assessment of articles, qualifying articles, and checking their compliance with inclusion and exclusion criteria. In the case of disagreement, the consensus was reached with the help of a fourth researcher. Methodological quality of selected articles was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programmed (CASP). This instrument includes 12 questions about diagnostic tests (Singh 2013). Studied articles were divided into 3 categories (high quality, moderate quality and low quality). Those articles that were studied by CASP criteria and were categorized as moderate or high quality were used in this systematic review. All 40 remained articles were scored as moderate or high quality.

Results

In the first stage, after searching in different databases 42,763 records identified. In the second stage, 19,743 records, due to being duplicate or non-English language were removed. In the third stage, the records were screened and the titles of the articles were reviewed. After assessing the articles in terms of design and quality criteria by four experts in the fields of social work, psychology, and rehabilitation, the articles that had titles unrelated to the topic or did not have full text were removed and 839 articles that met the least scientific requirements for being included in a systematic review were chosen. In the fourth stage, after reviewing the abstracts of articles, several articles unqualified for being included in the study were omitted, leaving 251 articles. Some of the reasons for removing these articles at this stage were: lack of valid tools, insufficient sample size and being a review study. Then, in the last stage, the full text of 251 articles was reviewed and methodology was analyzed to provide an accurate definition and explanation of the target group, study design, sampling method, sample size, and the validity and reliability of data collection tools. Finally, 40 articles remained for final evaluation. Figure 1 shows the process of the inclusion and exclusion of primary studies until reaching the final synthesis.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Summary of process used to identify and select studies for the review

Full size image

After searching and qualitative evaluation of the studies during a systematic review, in the end, the final synthesis was performed on 40 articles. As it turns out in Table 1, quantitative research has accounted for a larger share of studies.

Table 1 Frequency distribution of articles by research method
Full size table

According to Table 2, the distribution of studies in different countries is also easily understood. About 14 countries have directly studied this phenomenon, and some countries have conducted joint studies.

Table 2 Frequency distribution of articles according to the place of research
Full size table

The results of the studies were categorized into four themes: 1. Stigma experienced by people living with bipolar disorders and their families, 2. Predictors of stigma in people living with bipolar disorders and their families, 3. Consequences of stigma in people living with bipolar disorders and their families, 4. Effective interventions and strategies to reduce stigma in people living with bipolar disorders and their families.

Stigma experienced by people living with bipolar disorders and their families

According to studies, people living with bipolar disorders and their primary caregivers and family members experience stigma. These people are easily labeled by the society and experience stigma as a result. In addition, the public blames family members for incompetence on the patient, leading to the onset or recurrence of the disease. As a result, family members avoid attending social events and try to hide the affected member from society as much as possible. In Table 3, it is mentioned information on articles that have examined the stigma experienced by people living with bipolar disorders and their families and a summary of the findings of these articles is reported.

Table 3 Information on articles that have examined the stigma experienced by people living with bipolar disorders and their families
Full size table

Predictors of stigma in people living with bipolar disorders and their families

The analysis of studies showed that several factors could pave the path for stigma in people living with bipolar disorders and their families. These factors are known as the predictors of stigma, which can either alone or in combination with each other create stigma. In Table 4, it is mentioned information on articles that have examined the predictors of stigma in people living with bipolar disorders and their families and a summary of the findings of these articles is reported.

Table 4 Information on articles that have examined the predictors of stigma in people living with bipolar disorders and their families
Full size table

Consequences of sigma in people living with bipolar disorders and their families

Stigma has considerable consequences for people living with bipolar disorders and their families and causes them to suffer from severe psychological distress in addition to the pain and agony inflicted by the disease. In Table 5, it is mentioned information on articles that have examined the consequences of stigma in people living with bipolar disorders and their families and a summary of the findings of these articles is reported.

Table 5 Information on articles that have examined the consequences of stigma in people living with bipolar disorders and their families
Full size table

4- Effective interventions and strategies to reduce stigma in people living with bipolar disorders and their families

Numerous strategies and interventions have been suggested to cope with stigma and reduce its consequences in people living with bipolar disorders and their family members. Some of these strategies have been studied, and their positive outcomes in reducing stigma have been somehow illuminated. In Table 6, it is mentioned information on articles that have examined the effective interventions and strategies to reduce stigma in people living with bipolar disorders and their families and a summary of the findings of these articles is reported.

Table 6 Information on articles that have examined the effective interventions and strategies to reduce stigma in people living with bipolar disorders and their families
Full size table

Discussion

This study aimed to examining the experience of stigma and evaluating predictors, consequences and strategies to combat stigma in people with bipolar disorder and their families. Our findings suggest that people living with bipolar disorders and their families experience different levels of stigma, whose consequences, in general, include feelings of disrespect, disregard, and discrimination in society. To cope with this phenomenon, families often choose social isolation and withdrawal. They deprive themselves and the patient of receiving treatment by hiding the ill family member and delaying seeking treatment. Social stigma is the most devastating when the bipolar patients and their families accept it and internalized the negative views of the community, a phenomenon called internalized or emotional stigma. This is consistent with the findings of Bruni, Sharma, Wong, Bassirnia, Park, Grover, Ando and Leporil (Bruni et al. 2018; Sharma et al., 2017; Wong et al. 2009; Bassirnia et al. 2015; Park et al., 2014; Latifian et al. 2022a, b, c; Grover et al. 2019; Ando et al. 2013; Richard-Lepouriel et al. 2021).

The results of Ring and Thibodeau’s studies also showed that, people with mental health problems and their families experience stigma in various degrees. The experience of stigma in these people has led to inner turmoil in response to the stigma of others and weakening of family status among relatives and acquaintances. In addition, examining the experience of stigma in patients with schizophrenia and their families also showed that these people have problems in interpersonal interaction, structural discrimination, public images of mental illness and access to social roles, which all confirm the findings of this study (Ring et al., 2019; Thibodeau et al., 2017).

The analysis of available studies revealed that many factors could effectively predict stigma in people living with bipolar disorders and their families, including social and cultural structures, inefficient welfare system, low education, unemployment or lack of a suitable job, low self-esteem, poor communication skills, lack of intimate relationships with others, lack of being understood by others, poor social support, collectivist cultures, young age at disease onset, recurrent hospitalizations, gender, disease severity, disease duration, discriminative labels, lack of information/knowledge, generalization, banalization and reaction induced by public stigma in the general population, or among professionals such as health care professionals and employers. This finding was consistent with the results of Bonnington, Clemente, Favre, Sadeghi, Engidaw, Shumet, Thome, Cerit, Sarisoy, Howland, Ellison, Nilsson and Pal (Bonnington & Rose 2014; Clemente et al. 2017; Favre et al. 2022; Sadeghi et al. 2003; Engidaw et al. 2020; Shumet et al. 2021; Thomé et al. 2012; Cerit et al. 2012; Sarısoy et al. 2013; Howland et al. 2016; Ellison et al. 2015; Nilsson et al. 2016; Pal 2020).

In addition, the results of Bruni and Khaleghi’s studies also showed that in patients with psychiatric disorders, some personality traits may be accompanied by better empathic and communication skills, and may have a protective role against stigma. In these studies, violence, lack of knowledge and negative attitudes were introduced as predictors of stigma in psychiatric disorders (Bruni et al. 2018; Khaleghi et al. 2018). Moreover, the results of Świtaj’s study showed that in schizophrenia, saying offensive things about the mentally ill (69%), viewing unfavorably by others (63%) and treating them as less competent people (59%) identified as predictors of experience stigma in these patients and their families (Świtaj et al. 2009).

Studies have pointed out several consequences of stigma in these individuals, such as reduced participation, social deprivation, threats to mental health and reduced social adjustment emotional and sentimental excitement, objective and behavioral reflections, family solidarity threat, social exclusion, social isolation, restriction in social functions such as job performance and education, low self-esteem, poor quality of life, the prolongation of the treatment course, disease recurrence, hiding the disease, experiencing discrimination and injustice, and finally reduced life expectancy and resilience. These results were in line with previous studies of Bhattacharyya, Pal, Noak, Latifian, Perlick, Kumar, Sadighi, Au, Vazquez, Karidi, Post, Quenneville, Grover, Brohan and Mileva (Bhattacharyya et al. 2019; Pal 2020; Noack et al. 2016; Latifian et al. 2022a, b, c; Perlick et al. 2001, 2007; Kumar et al. 2020; Sadighi et al. 2015; Au et al. 2019; Vázquez et al. 2011; Karidi et al. 2015; Post et al. 2018; Quenneville et al. 2020; Grover et al. 2016; Brohan et al. 2011; Mileva et al. 2013).

The findings of Violeau and Klein's studies are also consistent with the results of this research. Because these studies have shown that the fear of being stigmatized or socially sanctioned and disgraced governs many aspects of human behavior. In many cases, the fear of stigma does not result in actual behavior change but rather leads individuals to simply hide certain behaviors or actions (for example, smoking in secrecy). When labeled as “schizophrenic,” patients feel a change in the way they are treated. This label affects the way patients interact with healthcare services as well as the world, since the illness becomes the central aspect of the patient’s identity. The impact of stigma on patient self-esteem should also be mentioned, since it is associated with a higher risk of depression and suicide (Violeau et al. 2020; Klein et al. 2021).

Several interventions have been suggested to alleviate stigma and its consequences in people living with bipolar disorders and their family members. The positive outcomes of these interventions included boosting public awareness and amending public attitudes toward bipolar disorder. Some of them included awareness, using alternative non-pharmaceutical therapies, enhancing self-esteem, using the ISE tool to identify patients’ experiences, psychological education and cognitive-behavioral interventions aiming to increase patients’ perceived recovery and sense of disease control. These results were in parallel with those of Michalak, Keshavarzpirpir, Richardson, Mileva, Post, Latifian, Nillson and Hawke (Michalak et al. 2011, Keshavarzpir et al. 2020; Richardson & White 2019; Mileva et al. 2013; Post et al. 2018; Latifian et al. 2022a, b, c; Nillson et al., 2016; Hawke et al. 2014).

Other evidence also suggests that health provider training can improve stigmatizing attitudes and that interventions combining positive messages of recovery potential with biological etiology will be most impactful to reduce stigma. Anti-stigma interventions designed specifically for health providers, family members, criminal justice personnel, and law enforcement seem particularly beneficial, given these sources of stigma (Wood et al. 2016). In addition, an understanding of the experience of family stigma can lead to the development of supportive strategies to manage this problem among caregivers of patients with psychiatry disorders. Mental health professionals can support caregivers by offering them opportunities to discuss how stigma is disrupting their caregiving roles. They can also support the caregivers in negotiating the experienced social and emotional distress and when necessary, refer them to the other members of healthcare teams (Ring et al., 2019).

Limitations

The limitations of this study are the possibility of not including in-press articles, exclusion of non-English articles, the lack of possibility for searching in a number of other databases, and the possibility of the non-retrieval of all related studies using the combinations of the utilized keywords. So, to acquire all related articles, in addition to searching using a combination of syntax, authors also searched a considerable number of retrieved articles manually. Also, due to insufficient time and the compulsion to do a systematic review as a prerequisite for preparing a doctoral thesis, the protocol of this study was not registered.

Conclusion

The results showed that stigma hurdles the treatment of people with bipolar disorder due to labeling, followed by hiding the disorder by families and delay in seeking treatment. Misconceptions such as considering these people dangerous and unpredictable and regarding families as culprits and irresponsible are present in society and workplace, educational settings, health care system, judiciary system, and even in the family. Therefore, it is necessary to take necessary measures to normalize bipolar disorder at the community level so that the general public becomes aware of its nature and understands stigma towards people with mental disorders. The findings of this study can provide useful information about stigma in people living with bipolar disorder, which can be used for mental health policymaking at the macro level, as well as by health care providers, the general public, and families at the micro level.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available.

References

  • Aggarwal NK, Balaji M, Kumar S, Mohanraj R, Rahman A, Verdeli H, Araya R, Jordans M, Chowdhary N, Patel V. Using consumer perspectives to inform the cultural adaptation of psychological treatments for depression: a mixed methods study from South Asia. J Affect Disord. 2014;163:88–101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ando S, Kasai K, Matamura M, Hasegawa Y, Hirakawa H, Asukai N. Psychosocial factors associated with suicidal ideation in clinical patients with depression. J Affect Disord. 2013;151(2):561–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Angst J. Bipolar disorders in DSM-5: strengths, problems and perspectives. Int J Bipolar Disord. 2013;1(1):1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Au CH, Wong CSM, Law CW, Wong MC, Chung KF. Self-stigma, stigma coping and functioning in remitted bipolar disorder. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2019;57:7–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bassirnia A, Briggs J, Kopeykina I, Mednick A, Yaseen Z, Galynker I. Relationship between personality traits and perceived internalized stigma in bipolar patients and their treatment partners. Psychiatry Res. 2015;230(2):436–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya D, Yadav A, Dwivedi AK. Relationship between stigma, self-esteem, and quality of life in euthymic patients of bipolar disorder: a cross-sectional study. J Mar Med Soc. 2019;21(2):145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BİLİR MK. Deinstitutionalization in mental health policy: from institutional-based to community-based mental healthcare services. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi. 2018;21(3):563–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnington O, Rose D. Exploring stigmatisation among people diagnosed with either bipolar disorder or borderline personality disorder: a critical realist analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2014;123:7–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brohan E, Gauci D, Sartorius N, Thornicroft G, G. E. S. Group. Self-stigma, empowerment and perceived discrimination among people with bipolar disorder or depression in 13 European countries: the GAMIAN–Europe study. J Affect Disord. 2011;129(1–3):56–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruni A, Carbone EA, Pugliese V, Aloi M, Calabrò G, Cerminara G, Segura-García C, De Fazio P. Childhood adversities are different in schizophrenic spectrum disorders, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder. BMC Psychiatry. 2018;18(1):391.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cerit C, Filizer A, Tural Ü, Tufan AE. Stigma: a core factor on predicting functionality in bipolar disorder. Compr Psychiatry. 2012;53(5):484–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clemente AS, Santos WJd, Nicolato R, Firmo JOA. Stigma related to bipolar disorder in the perception of psychiatrists from Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais State Brazil. Cadernos de saude publica. 2017;33:e00050016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Connell J, O’Cathain A, Brazier J. Measuring quality of life in mental health: are we asking the right questions? Soc Sci Med. 2014;120:12–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison N, Mason O, Scior K. Bipolar disorder and stigma: a systematic review of the literature. J Affect Disord. 2013;151(3):805–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison N, Mason O, Scior K. Public beliefs about and attitudes towards bipolar disorder: testing theory based models of stigma. J Affect Disord. 2015;175:116–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engidaw NA, Asefa EY, Belayneh Z, Wubetu AD. Stigma resistance and its associated factors among people with bipolar disorder at Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Depression Res Treat. 2020;2020:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Favre S, Aubry JM, Richard-Lepouriel H. Perceived public stigma and perceived public exposure by persons living with bipolar disorder: a qualitative study. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640221093495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghai S, Sharma N, Sharma S, Kaur H. Shame & stigma of mental illness. Delhi Psychiatry Journal. 2013;16(2):293–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. Stigma. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON). 2003.

  • Grover S, Hazari N, Aneja J, Chakrabarti S, Avasthi A. Stigma and its correlates among patients with bipolar disorder: a study from a tertiary care hospital of North India. Psychiatry Res. 2016;244:109–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grover S, Aneja J, Hazari N, Chakrabarti S, Avasthi A. Stigma and its correlates among caregivers of patients with bipolar disorder. Indian J Psychol Med. 2019;41(5):455–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gur K, Sener N, Kucuk L, Cetindag Z, Basar M. The beliefs of teachers toward mental illness. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2012;47:1146–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawke LD, Parikh SV, Michalak EE. Stigma and bipolar disorder: a review of the literature. J Affect Disord. 2013;150(2):181–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hawke LD, Michalak EE, Maxwell V, Parikh SV. Reducing stigma toward people with bipolar disorder: impact of a filmed theatrical intervention based on a personal narrative. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2014;60(8):741–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson C, Evans-Lacko S, Thornicroft G. Mental illness stigma, help seeking, and public health programs. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(5):777–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Howland M, Levin J, Blixen C, Tatsuoka C, Sajatovic M. Mixed-methods analysis of internalized stigma correlates in poorly adherent individuals with bipolar disorder. Compr Psychiatry. 2016;70:174–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jolfaei AG, Ataei S, Ghayoomi R, Shabani A. High frequency of bipolar disorder comorbidity in medical inpatients. Iran J Psychiatry. 2019;14(1):60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaltenboeck A, Winkler D, Kasper S. Bipolar and related disorders in DSM-5 and ICD-10. CNS Spectr. 2016;21(4):318–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karidi M, Vassilopoulou D, Savvidou E, Vitoratou S, Maillis A, Rabavilas A, Stefanis C. Bipolar disorder and self-stigma: a comparison with schizophrenia. J Affect Disord. 2015;184:209–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keshavarz, Fatemi, Mardani, Esmaiely, Haghani. Effect of psychoeducation program on internalized stigma of clients with bipolar disorder. 2018.

  • Keshavarzpir Z, Seyedfatemi N, Mardani-Hamooleh M, Esmaeeli N, Boyd JE. The effect of psychoeducation on internalized stigma of the hospitalized patients with bipolar disorder: a quasi-experimental study. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2020;42(1):79–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khaleghi A, Mohammadi MR, Zandifar A, Ahmadi N, Alavi SS, Ahmadi A, Mahmoudi-Gharaei J, Hooshyari Z, Mostafavi A, Fooladi MF. Epidemiology of psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents; in Tehran, 2017. Asian J Psychiatr. 2018;37:146–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klein P, Fairweather AK, Lawn S, Stallman HM, Cammell P. Structural stigma and its impact on healthcare for consumers with borderline personality disorder: protocol for a scoping review. Syst Rev. 2021;10(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight MT, Wykes T, Hayward P. Group treatment of perceived stigma and self-esteem in schizophrenia: a waiting list trial of efficacy. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2006;34(3):305–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koschorke M, Padmavati R, Kumar S, Cohen A, Weiss HA, Chatterjee S, Pereira J, Naik S, John S, Dabholkar H. Experiences of stigma and discrimination of people with schizophrenia in India. Soc Sci Med. 2014;123:149–59.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar KS, Vankar GK, Goyal AD, Sharma AS. Stigma and discrimination in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar mood disorder. Annals Indian Psychiatry. 2020;4(1):33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latifian M, Raheb G, Abdi K, Alikhani R. The bipolar patients’ family experiences of the outcomes of encountering stigma in Tehran: a qualitative study. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640221113748.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Latifian M, Raheb G, Uddin R, Abdi K, Alikhani R. The process of stigma experience in the families of people living with bipolar disorder: a grounded theory study. BMC Psychol. 2022b;10(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43057-022-00080-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latifian M, Raheb G, Abdi K, Alikhani R, Shariful Islam SM. The effectiveness of psychoeducation in improving attitudes towards psychological disorders and internalized stigma in the family members of bipolar patients: a quasi-experimental study. PsyCh J. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.621.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCann TV, Lubman DI, Clark E. Responding to stigma: first-time caregivers of young people with first-episode psychosis. Psychiatr Serv. 2011;62(5):548–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michalak E, Livingston JD, Hole R, Suto M, Hale S, Haddock C. ‘It’s something that I manage but it is not who I am’: reflections on internalized stigma in individuals with bipolar disorder. Chronic Illn. 2011;7(3):209–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michalak EE, Livingston JD, Maxwell V, Hole R, Hawke LD, Parikh SV. Using theatre to address mental illness stigma: a knowledge translation study in bipolar disorder. Int J Bipolar Disord. 2014;2(1):1–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mileva VR, Vázquez GH, Milev R. Effects, experiences, and impact of stigma on patients with bipolar disorder. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013;9:31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi MR, Ahmadi N, Khaleghi A, Mostafavi SA, Kamali K, Rahgozar M, Ahmadi A, Hooshyari Z, Alavi SS, Molavi P. Prevalence and correlates of psychiatric disorders in a national survey of Iranian children and adolescents. Iran J Psychiatry. 2019;14(1):1.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson KK, Kugathasan P, Straarup KN. Characteristics, correlates and outcomes of perceived stigmatization in bipolar disorder patients. J Affect Disord. 2016;194:196–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noack K, Elliott NB, Canas E, Lane K, Paquette A, Lavigne J-M, Michalak EE. Credible, centralized, safe, and stigma–free: What youth with bipolar disorder want when seeking health information online. UBC Medical Journal. 2016;8(1):27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal A. A cross-sectional study of internalized stigma in euthymic patients of bipolar disorder across its predominant polarity. Indian J Soc Psychiatry. 2020;36(1):73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal A, Sharan P, Chadda RK. Internalized stigma and its impact in Indian outpatients with bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2017;258:158–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pal A, Saxena V, Avinash P. Stigma in bipolar affective disorder: a systematic quantitative literature review of Indian studies. Indian J Psychol Med. 2021;43(3):187–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Park S, Park KS. Family stigma: a concept analysis. Asian Nurs Res. 2014;8(3):165–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perich T, Mitchell PB, Vilus B. Stigma in bipolar disorder: a current review of the literature. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674221080708.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perlick DA, Rosenheck RA, Clarkin JF, Sirey JA, Salahi J, Struening EL, Link BG. Stigma as a barrier to recovery: adverse effects of perceived stigma on social adaptation of persons diagnosed with bipolar affective disorder. Psychiatr Serv. 2001;52(12):1627–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perlick DA, Miklowitz DJ, Link BG, Struening E, Kaczynski R, Gonzalez J, Rosenheck RA. Perceived stigma and depression among caregivers of patients with bipolar disorder. Br J Psychiatry. 2007;190(6):535–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Post F, Pardeller S, Frajo-Apor B, Kemmler G, Sondermann C, Hausmann A, Fleischhacker WW, Mizuno Y, Uchida H, Hofer A. Quality of life in stabilized outpatients with bipolar I disorder: associations with resilience, internalized stigma, and residual symptoms. J Affect Disord. 2018;238:399–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quenneville AF, Badoud D, Nicastro R, Jermann F, Favre S, Kung A-L, Euler S, Perroud N, Richard-Lepouriel H. Internalized stigmatization in borderline personality disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in comparison to bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2020;262:317–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richard-Lepouriel, H., Aubry, J.-M., & Favre, S. (2021). Is Coping with Stigma by Association Role-Specific for Different Family Members? A Qualitative Study with Bipolar Disorder Patients’ Relatives. Community mental health journal, 1–14.

  • Richardson T, White L. The impact of a CBT-based bipolar disorder psychoeducation group on views about diagnosis, perceived recovery, self-esteem and stigma. tCBT. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1754470X19000308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ring D, Lawn S. Stigma perpetuation at the interface of mental health care: a review to compare patient and clinician perspectives of stigma and borderline personality disorder. J Mental Health. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2019.1581337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghi M, Kaviani K, Rezai R. Stigma of mental disorder among families of patients with major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. 2003.

  • Sadighi G, Khodaei MR, Fadaie F, Mirabzadeh A, Sadighi A. Self stigma among people with bipolar-I disorder in Iran. Iran Rehabil J. 2015;13(1):32–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarısoy G, Kaçar ÖF, Pazvantoğlu O, Korkmaz IZ, Öztürk A, Akkaya D, Yılmaz S, Böke Ö, Sahin AR. Internalized stigma and intimate relations in bipolar and schizophrenic patients: a comparative study. Compr Psychiatry. 2013;54(6):665–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ShamsaieeVana. K. The meaning of health from the perspective of a family member caring for a patient with bipolar disorder: a qualitative study. Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2013;22(90):52–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma H, Sharma B, Sharma DB. Burden, perceived stigma and coping style of caregivers of patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Int J Health Sci Res. 2017;7(11):84–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shumet S, Angaw D, Ergete T, Alemnew N. Magnitude of internalised stigma and associated factors among people with bipolar disorder at Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2021;11(4): e044824.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sibitz I, Unger A, Woppmann A, Zidek T, Amering M. Stigma resistance in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2011;37(2):316–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh J. Critical appraisal skills programme. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2013;4(1):76–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Świtaj P, Wciórka J, Smolarska-Świtaj J, Grygiel P. Extent and predictors of stigma experienced by patients with schizophrenia. Eur Psychiatry. 2009;24(8):513–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thibodeau R. Continuum beliefs and schizophrenia stigma: correlational and experimental evidence. Stigma Health. 2017;2(4):266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomé E, Dargél A, Migliavacca F, Potter W, Jappur D, Kapczinski F, Ceresér K. Stigma experiences in bipolar patients: the impact upon functioning. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2012;19(8):665–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez G, Kapczinski F, Magalhaes P, Córdoba R, Jaramillo CL, Rosa A, De Carmona MS, Tohen M, Ibero-American Network on Bipolar Disorders group. Stigma and functioning in patients with bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2011;130(1–2):323–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Violeau L, Valery KM, Fournier T, Prouteau A. How continuum beliefs can reduce stigma of schizophrenia: the role of perceived similarities. Schizophr Res. 2020;220:46–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wong C, Davidson L, Anglin D, Link B, Gerson R, Malaspina D, McGlashan T, Corcoran C. Stigma in families of individuals in early stages of psychotic illness: family stigma and early psychosis. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2009;3(2):108–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wood L, Byrne R, Varese F, Morrison AP. Psychosocial interventions for internalised stigma in people with a schizophrenia-spectrum diagnosis: a systematic narrative synthesis and meta-analysis. Schizophr Res. 2016;176(2–3):291–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present study is part of a Ph.D. dissertation (ethics code: IR.USWR.REC.1399.249) in social work approved by the University of social welfare and rehabilitation sciences. We would like to appreciate the full cooperation of the university officials.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, or publication of the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychosis Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Maryam Latifian, Ghoncheh Raheb & Rosa Alikhani

  2. Department of Rehabilitation Management, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Kianoush Abdi

  3. Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia

    Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam

Authors
  1. Maryam Latifian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kianoush Abdi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ghoncheh Raheb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rosa Alikhani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ML and GR Conceived and designed the analysis and conducted the literature search. ML, SHI KA and RA performed the analysis and wrote the paper. ML, GR, SHI KA and RA edited the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kianoush Abdi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors have agreed for publication of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Latifian, M., Abdi, K., Raheb, G. et al. Stigma in people living with bipolar disorder and their families: a systematic review. Int J Bipolar Disord 11, 9 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40345-023-00290-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40345-023-00290-y

Keywords